Tuesday, November 30, 2004
No protection for journalists' sources?
I found a link to this National Post piece on Zeke's Gallery. National Post: "A reporter who refused to testify about where he got confidential information is no longer facing a criminal record but could still be found in contempt of court, because journalists are not ''above the law,'' a judge said Monday." ¶ 7:34 p.m.
I found a link to this National Post piece on Zeke's Gallery. National Post: "A reporter who refused to testify about where he got confidential information is no longer facing a criminal record but could still be found in contempt of court, because journalists are not ''above the law,'' a judge said Monday." ¶ 7:34 p.m.
